<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baptists Going Green&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

I&#039;m not surprised their response falls back to autonomy.  Getting Baptists to agree about anything, much less something controversial like global warming / climate change, is quite difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised their response falls back to autonomy.  Getting Baptists to agree about anything, much less something controversial like global warming / climate change, is quite difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Kummer</title>
		<link>http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>I just read Richard Land&#039;s response. Their website was acting weird so I pulled it up via the RSS feed. Here is what he said:

&lt;em&gt;
“Given the fact the Convention has officially addressed the issues of creation care and environmental stewardship in its 2006 and 2007 Conventions through resolutions adopted by the Convention’s duly elected messengers (see links below to view cited SBC resolutions), the ERLC does not agree that Southern Baptists have been ‘too timid’ in addressing these issues.

“Southern Baptists, collectively and individually, jealously guard their independence and autonomy. They reserve to themselves the right to decide through Convention action what the Southern Baptist Convention’s public policy positions are to be. The ERLC will continue to share the officially adopted positions of the Convention with public policy makers and the media. Thus, the ERLC has declined to endorse ‘A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change’ in its present form.”

&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read Richard Land&#8217;s response. Their website was acting weird so I pulled it up via the RSS feed. Here is what he said:</p>
<p><em><br />
“Given the fact the Convention has officially addressed the issues of creation care and environmental stewardship in its 2006 and 2007 Conventions through resolutions adopted by the Convention’s duly elected messengers (see links below to view cited SBC resolutions), the ERLC does not agree that Southern Baptists have been ‘too timid’ in addressing these issues.</p>
<p>“Southern Baptists, collectively and individually, jealously guard their independence and autonomy. They reserve to themselves the right to decide through Convention action what the Southern Baptist Convention’s public policy positions are to be. The ERLC will continue to share the officially adopted positions of the Convention with public policy makers and the media. Thus, the ERLC has declined to endorse ‘A Southern Baptist Declaration on the Environment and Climate Change’ in its present form.”</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Baptist Environmentalism Initative Movement &#124; SBC Voices</title>
		<link>http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/comment-page-1/#comment-3919</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Baptist Environmentalism Initative Movement &#124; SBC Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toward-the-goal.net/2008/03/10/baptists-going-green/#comment-3919</guid>
		<description>[...] John Stickley raises some concerns about the wording of the declaration. He writes: Here’s my suggestion. If you’ve got no “special revelation”, “special training”, or the like that allows you to assess “whether global warming is occurring and, if it is occurring, whether people are causing it”… stick to the theological issues and principles that lead Christians to a position of environmental stewardship, and leave climate change out of your statements. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Stickley raises some concerns about the wording of the declaration. He writes: Here’s my suggestion. If you’ve got no “special revelation”, “special training”, or the like that allows you to assess “whether global warming is occurring and, if it is occurring, whether people are causing it”… stick to the theological issues and principles that lead Christians to a position of environmental stewardship, and leave climate change out of your statements. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
